Re: Latest Thing on Intrcoolers / Intracoolers
This looks good. It can be instlled without so much disturbance to the stock stuff under the hood. I wonder if the water side will handle the pressure of AC coolant? I'm still wondering why the AC idea hasn't taken off. Is is because the power to run the AC compressor is more than what the denser air will provide?
Sorry for these "basic" questions, but I have to replace my worn out AC anyway and thought I better explore putting in an AC intracooler before I have this work done. If the intracooler isn't the way to go then this air to water setup looks pretty good.
Ridhard
92 TY
136K mi
now in Houston
The problem with the intracooler is that in order to make it effective, you have to cool down a fairly large amount of water- otherwise, you're cooling/heating/wait for cooling/heating/etc.
You can't just cool the air directly like the A/C system does... there's waay too much heat energy in the output air from the turbo. Also, the A/C doesn't run under WOT, so all your cooling happens under part throttle/cruise conditions.
Kevin Moore's Intracooler setup was around as recently as a couple years ago... don't know for sure if/where he's still around. They had fairly elaborate trunk mounted systems for large power applications.
They were a bit complicated, but they were unmatched in terms of cold potential. You could get down to 40 degree IATs.
The trick to making Water/Air work is as much about having a large volume of water as it is having a good heat exchanger. A really big heat exchanger can add volume and heat transfer surface to the system. The big tradeoff is weight - water is heavy.
The cooler in the link above looks like a good one. You can also look for large oil coolers (This is what ATR used) or transmission coolers. Also, rear heater cores used in school busses are also good targets.
I think a lot of people would be surprised at how well a Water/Air can perform with enough capacity and heat transfer area.