sy2206
New member
Kris wrote
2002 was to the right
2003 will be central
2004 looks like there will be one to the left
How do you figure 2002 nats were to the right? Chicago is not very far east from the center of the country on my map, mabey you have a different kind of map?
I think we can all agree that KC is as close to the center of the US as possible. According to my map, it is 531 miles from KC to Chicago. It also says it's 1358 miles from KC to Vegas. It's 605 miles from KC to Denver. Come on Kris, lets do the math. Grab your calculator.
If KC is the Center of the U.S., and you say the 2002 Nats were "To the right", and the 2003 Nats are central. Than we should have the 2004 Nats "to the left" in Denver. And this will be even farther west from KC than 2002 was to the east.
Even St Louis or Dallas wouldn't be too bad. I'd still say Denver, Nashville, or Memphis.
Mark Christofferson
91 Sy #2206
12.47 @ 105.6
2002 was to the right
2003 will be central
2004 looks like there will be one to the left
How do you figure 2002 nats were to the right? Chicago is not very far east from the center of the country on my map, mabey you have a different kind of map?
I think we can all agree that KC is as close to the center of the US as possible. According to my map, it is 531 miles from KC to Chicago. It also says it's 1358 miles from KC to Vegas. It's 605 miles from KC to Denver. Come on Kris, lets do the math. Grab your calculator.
If KC is the Center of the U.S., and you say the 2002 Nats were "To the right", and the 2003 Nats are central. Than we should have the 2004 Nats "to the left" in Denver. And this will be even farther west from KC than 2002 was to the east.
Even St Louis or Dallas wouldn't be too bad. I'd still say Denver, Nashville, or Memphis.
Mark Christofferson
91 Sy #2206
12.47 @ 105.6