A weeks review on tuning in a new build with Code59.....

2kwik4u

Resident slow guy
I had the opportunity this last week or so (~5 days) to get ahold of a truck with a VERY VERY rough tune setup on the new Code59 project. Let me preface everything from here out by saying I'm a newbie tuner at best, and I owe a great deal to Mike Hardman for letting me essentially cut my tuning teeth on his semi-fresh motor (less than 2,500miles). His patience, and trust is greatly appreciated, and I can't say enough about that....so on to other thoughts.

The build:
Forged pistons and rods with splayed 4bolt mains
Vortec heads, basically stock with newer (03 and up) roller valvetrain
Upgraded cam (412 I think)
Port matched, and converted stock intake
50lb injectors
PT52 from a buick
RPM A2A intercooler
Stock tranny, and convertor :( <--Word through teh "vine" is 80E, and 3k stall are coming soon
Currently RWD only <--Jeff and Jeremy broke the propshaft a few weeks ago....those bastages

Equipment:
New NGK wideband
Ostrich
USB ALDL cable
TunerProRT with latest Code59 ADS, and XDF files
Autotune spreadsheet developed by Code59 guru's
Acer Aspire Laptop (1.3Ghz Turion, 1GB ram, 80Gb HD)

The tuner : (thats me :D)
26 year old Mechanical Engineer
I had a good understanding of the logic in the computer, but had VERY VERY little practice changing values, and doing any hands on tuning. Having watched it a couple times, I was confident I could pick it up pretty quick, but had never actually "changed a table" before. I was (still am) a newbie at best when I started.

The Story
When I picked the truck up, it had been setup by Jeff Scott to run on the Code59. He and the other Code59 guys have done a good job of getting that tested, and out and running. It seemed to work flawlessly, and as expected. The tune that was in it was just enough to make it driveable. There were a ton of lean spots, and trying to drive it around town was a study in frustration. It popped, and missed, and did lots of bad things in general. The fan was wired to come on from the IC pump relay, but wasn't working. The TC was locking at like 30mph, and all kinds of goofy crap. Tip in stumble that was harsh enough to make me almost hit my face on the steering wheel once......it was rough....but ran. Ironically cruise was pretty close on the expressway.

First challenge was to get TunerProRT up and working. I had an older release that was crashing anytime I tried to copy info from it, and had a few other minor issues with my version of Excell conflicting with the Autotune spreadsheet, so that took me a day or so to work out, and get going. Once I got the setup though it seemed to work OK. One hint I'd like to pass along, is ALWAYS tell TunerProRT to stop monitoring BEFORE you yank the ALDL cable from the USB port. If not it will hang, and cause all kinds of crashing in tunerpro issues.....I didn't figure this out till Sunday afternoon, but it's fitting in this section I think.

I started picking the problems apart one by one, and attacking each one seperately.

First on the list was the fan. It was set to come on at all times. Chip was set at like 19*c upper, and lower threshold. I did some searching, and posting, and couldn't get a great answer, so I set ALL LOW enables to 160, and all HIGH enables to 170....This provided the desired results, so I moved on to the lean spots.

I knew the VE table needed work. I'm not experienced enough to know what was a "logical" value on the table and what wasn't, so I proceeded to log a ton of data, and run an Autotune after each log. This was moving me in the right direction, but slowly (and safely mind you). After about 4 days of this, and only showing a few signs of good progress, I decided Saturday morning to hand smooth the VE graph with TunerPro's graph feature. I spent the better part of an hour smoothing the table down. This provided HUGE, I mean HUGE gains in driveability. It was also a tad rich though.

On to more datalogging. I drove around a good deal on Saturday, and did a ton more logging. At this point I started using AutoTune as a reccomendation moreso than a bible. If it suggested that one or two cells needed a big decrease, I would take that, implement it in the table, then re-smooth. This seems to be working good, and continued for a few more drives. 95% of this was driveability. Boost would come later I was told,and the truck was a bit rich under boost, and not knocking too bad, so I left that till later. After a bunch more logging and driving I was close.

I also noticed that the torque convertor wasn't locking normally. Started looking around throughthe chip, and talked with Jeff some, and found there was a setting in the chip for min temp for TCC lockup.....Dropped that down a bit, and all was well. I also raised the lock speed to about 55 or so, and that seemed to make a good difference as well around town. It wasn't locking up, and lugging the motor like it used to, making it alot easier to drive. It was nice to be seeing changes made, and results moving accordingly.

Yesterday I took the truck up to Jeremys place to get a few otehr issues sorted out (efan wiring cleaned up, battery tie down fixed, etc). While there I had Jeremy go for a ride with me. He noticed while under boost it was knocking more than I could see whilst driving so we started in on the timing table. Started pulling timing (it was running like 27 degrees at WOT and 15psi !!!!) back to a more acceptable level. This livened up the truck a good bit, and made it feel a ton better. Alsonoticed that it was a bit lean according to normal Sy/Ty standards (near 11.5:1 at WOT). Mike wants to run it a bit leaner, but I thought that was a safe AFR at 15psi, and if he wants to push more I'll be glad to help when he is around more.

Leaving Jeremys after some more tuning help from him, I forgot to upload the new bin I created at his shop, so I pulled over did that and it improved a bit more. Taking a few more laps around Southern Indiana proved to be helpfull. I was finding that I could spot a trouble area while driving, and glance at the screen and see where it was in the table (thanks to the bubble in TunerPro), pull off to a safe spot off the road, and change that area the direction it needed to go by 5% or so.....This created a "spike" in the graph, and I could go in and change/smoth the graph, and get some decent results....I proceeded to drop the truck at Jeffs, to await Mikes coming to pick it up on Wednesday of this coming week.

In the end I've learned that Autotune will get you where you want, but is ultimately more usefull as a tool for organizing data than it is as a tool to create new VE tables. By nature it is very exact, and by nature the VE table isn't, as it is always interpolating between cells. Once I had that figured out, and learned that a smooth graph was a happy graph, all is well.

I'll post some screen shots for examples when I get home tonight, as well as some more thoughts on the entire setup. Again I have to give a huge thanks to Mike Hardman on all this. His trust in me to not completely fork up his truck is unparralleled. Jeff and Jeremy were also big helps in the theory of tuning, and what AFR to run, and things of that nature. Although being the team that put a stock turbo into the 11's I'd certainly think they'd know what they are doing.
 
Last edited:

2kwik4u

Resident slow guy
Re: A weeks review on tuning in a new build with Code59.....

Heres the aforementioned screen shots.....Notice there is a huge difference in both height, and shape of the map. I have a feeling that the realtive smoothness of the new map contributes alot to it running well.

Before (click for larger image)


Middle (after 9 Autotunes)


After (again click gets a larger image)...This was after I hand smoothed the table, and am 90% happywith the way it's running.


Something that I just noticed on the graphs is that the colors are a bit misleading. Be sure to look at the labels to see what the actual values are, as Tunerpro simply makes the highest values red, and the lowest blue, and fades through green in between. For example the very first fuel map has a high spike at 93VE, and the new one has a high spot of 85VE. Those values seem a bit off, but I also fiddled with the F77X table (extended boost multiplier) to help smooth things out, so thats why the values dropped some

Heres the timing when I picked it up.


After fiddling with things this is the graph I ended up with. No knock at 15psi boost, and ~100* Manifold temps. Come spring time it will need to have the table that adjusts timing based on manifold temp changed some. With any luck I'll be able to be around when that table gets adjusted as well.


With that said, I drove the truck again tonight back to back against my ZR5, and it made it obvious that while it's made some good progress forward, there is a ton left to do. Mike is taking the truck home with him on Wednesday, so my time is up with it. Maybe I'll go visit it on every other weekend?!?!? :D :D

I'm also hoping to get something to tune that is mine in the near future.....however I'll have been saying that for the better part of 5 years here soon :(.....Maybe one day, who knows.
 
Last edited:

JSM

Active member
Re: A weeks review on tuning in a new build with Code59.....

I drove the truck in question yesterday. Mike did a great job and it was fun watching him learn. There is no subsitute for hands on changing and experience.

This just goes to show everybody else if Dobrick can tune and doesn't even own a truck, what is everybody else waiting for? Your getting outdone by Dobrick.
 

Six-is-Enough

Use to do a little Boost
Re: A weeks review on tuning in a new build with Code59.....

JS Manufacturing said:
I drove the truck in question yesterday. Mike did a great job and it was fun watching him learn. There is no subsitute for hands on changing and experience.

This just goes to show everybody else if Dobrick can tune and doesn't even own a truck, what is everybody else waiting for? Your getting outdone by Dobrick.

:stupid:
 

Six-is-Enough

Use to do a little Boost
Re: A weeks review on tuning in a new build with Code59.....

Also I haven't seen a post that long and detailed since Tooky was around!!!
 

ashman

------
Re: A weeks review on tuning in a new build with Code59.....

Excellent post Mike. Thanks for taking the time to document it. Your experiences are VERY close to what I discovered..only it took me A LOT longer :) Actually, I learned a few things in your post that I didn't realize. My hopes are that when the gurus finally release this beast, the tuning discussions will really increase.
 

2kwik4u

Resident slow guy
Re: A weeks review on tuning in a new build with Code59.....

Six-is-Enough said:
Also I haven't seen a post that long and detailed since Tooky was around!!!

Thanks,

Can't expect to learn anything without knowing what changes you've made, and what it impact they had. (good argument for history class in school as well). Including all the Autotunes (which are roughly 12mb in size each) I have near 250mb of saved bin files, logs, spreadsheets, and tuning notes.

I can post the logs as well if anyone is curious to see how the truck was running when I picked it up versus when Jeremy and I were out tuning on it. I can probably grab a log from tomorrow night as well to get a good idea of where it currently is.

Something else I should mention is I've learned very quickly that the girlfriend, nor her dog (shizhu) like boosted launches, high speed corners, or the smell of a mostly open exhaust. She's also somewhat agrivated at having to hold a laptop when riding to dinner, and even more agrivated when I take it in with me to make changes while eating.......Just a heads up for the guys that are able to convince women to hang around them. Tuning is NOT a relationship enhancing sport.
 

phoonTy

Truckless. For now.
Re: A weeks review on tuning in a new build with Code59.....

Great Post! :tup:

You've been "Newsflashed" on SyTy.org's front page. :tup: If it's okay with you, I'll combine your posts into an article for the Tech Section. :cool:
 

JSM

Active member
Re: A weeks review on tuning in a new build with Code59.....

phoonTy said:
Great Post! :tup:

You've been "Newsflashed" on SyTy.org's front page. :tup: If it's okay with you, I'll combine your posts into an article for the Tech Section. :cool:

Dobrick in the news and on the front page, doesn't suprise me.

Dobrick in the news for NOT getting injured, set of fire, wrecking or breaking a car. That suprises me.
 

2kwik4u

Resident slow guy
Re: A weeks review on tuning in a new build with Code59.....

phoonTy said:
Great Post! :tup:

You've been "Newsflashed" on SyTy.org's front page. :tup: If it's okay with you, I'll combine your posts into an article for the Tech Section. :cool:

Please help yourself. I was hoping the information would be usefull to someone, and I would be more than happy to provide you with the datalogs, and any other screenshots you might want.

Perhaps combine this at the end of some of the "tuning 101" posts from Jeff?!?!?
 

Syclone0565

CustomMulticades.com
Re: A weeks review on tuning in a new build with Code59.....

No if you only had a Syclone to tune yourself :lol:
 

myclone

Donating Member
Re: A weeks review on tuning in a new build with Code59.....

VERY nice post! Talk about a breath of fresh air from the "which wheels will fit/how do I change spark plugs" posts!!

Mind if I ask a few questions and make some observations?
2kwik4u said:
First on the list was the fan. It was set to come on at all times. Chip was set at like 19*c upper, and lower threshold. I did some searching, and posting, and couldn't get a great answer, so I set ALL LOW enables to 160, and all HIGH enables to 170....This provided the desired results, so I moved on to the lean spots.

Can you go into a little more detail on what the issue with the fan was? If I read the post correctly it appears that it was set up to run all of the time but you wanted it to turn it on at 170 deg and off at 160 deg. Yes?


I also noticed that the torque convertor wasn't locking normally. Started looking around throughthe chip, and talked with Jeff some, and found there was a setting in the chip for min temp for TCC lockup.....Dropped that down a bit, and all was well. I also raised the lock speed to about 55 or so, and that seemed to make a good difference as well around town. It wasn't locking up, and lugging the motor like it used to, making it alot easier to drive.

Can you go into more detail on what result you were after as far as lock up parameters? If I read the above info correctly it appears that you enabled lock up at a lower fluid temprature but delayed it actually happening until 55mph. Yes?

FWIW once you get the tune sorted out more an early lock up at light throttle really helps keep the cops from hounding you if you run an open dump or loud exh. It wont hurt anything as long as the fuel/timing tune is good...just dont lug the motor a lot if the mixture is fat or you'll be mad at me for fouling plugs out all the time LOL.

Much props for posting up the info and hopefully this will entice others (like myself) to start doing some tuning rather than throwing parts at their trucks.
 

2kwik4u

Resident slow guy
Re: A weeks review on tuning in a new build with Code59.....

myclone said:
VERY nice post! Talk about a breath of fresh air from the "which wheels will fit/how do I change spark plugs" posts!!

Mind if I ask a few questions and make some observations?

Can you go into a little more detail on what the issue with the fan was? If I read the post correctly it appears that it was set up to run all of the time but you wanted it to turn it on at 170 deg and off at 160 deg. Yes?

Yes, that is exactly what was happening. When Jeff first setup the Code 59 chip, he used an Ultimate 50# chip as a basis. They are setup to run the intercooler pump ALL the time. So even though we had the wiring correct, the tune needed to be modified to keep the fan from running all the time. With the above mentioned setting the temp comes up to ~170, then the fan kicks on, and either maintains, or lowers the temp back to 160 and kicks off. I'm sure these aren't ideal temp settings for the fan, but they were a good place to start in colder weather I thought. Mike has a fan with no shroud, so I'm sure once he gets a new fan, those will change again, as well as with the weather.



myclone said:
Can you go into more detail on what result you were after as far as lock up parameters? If I read the above info correctly it appears that you enabled lock up at a lower fluid temprature but delayed it actually happening until 55mph. Yes?

FWIW once you get the tune sorted out more an early lock up at light throttle really helps keep the cops from hounding you if you run an open dump or loud exh. It wont hurt anything as long as the fuel/timing tune is good...just dont lug the motor a lot if the mixture is fat or you'll be mad at me for fouling plugs out all the time LOL.

There were two problems with the convertor.

The first was that it was locking SUPER SUPER low....like 35mph or something like that. With the tune being off it was creating a helluva hard truck to drive around town. I simply raised it so that while cruising around it stays unlocked, and happy. With the larger cam (which I forgot to mention in the post above, and I'll fix) and the larger turbo there is little bottom end to the truck, and when it's lugging around at 1500rpm in a 45mph sone it wasn't happy. Once he gets the 80E, and new convertor in I'm sure this will change as well. I totally agree that once the final setup is installed we will probably drop that back to the 40-45mph range to keep Johnny Law away, as well as the droning from all the resonance of a semi-open exhaust.

The second issue isn't so much the convertor, but the way the engine was staying cool. I think his thermostat is stuck open because on the highway in 20 degree ambient temps the coolant temp was dropping to the 120 range. This would drop below the minimum temp threshold for the convertor to lock, and producing more RPM at cruise than desired. Lowering this temp setting in the chip fixed that. This is another one of those things, taht will change again I'm sure once he puts fender wells back in, and the weather gets warm again.

Since I know like most people Mike is strapped for time, and cash during the holidays, my thoughts were to make it so that he could hop in the truck with the current setup, and have a very liveable tune to cruise around with. It seems that the majority of the guys in this area, are plagued with either no motivation, or tons of motivation, and not time/money to get it done, or a combination of both (perhaps this is everywhere I dunno). My hopes are that when he is down tomorrow night, he likes the tune, and gets "re-excited" about the truck, and can make some more forward progress on it in the near future.

Plus if I'm nice enough he might let me race it again at Nats next year :D :D

myclone said:
Much props for posting up the info and hopefully this will entice others (like myself) to start doing some tuning rather than throwing parts at their trucks.

I certainly hope this motivates some people. I know I've read of at least a few builds that I would like to see up and running well. I feel very strongly now that if I can make any forward progress with a little time, that someone who actually owns a truck can take a bit more time, and make equal or better progress with the right tools.
 

ashman

------
Re: A weeks review on tuning in a new build with Code59.....

more people might get motivated if $59 were released...hint hint :)
 

UR50SLO

V6+2=LSXCamaro
Re: A weeks review on tuning in a new build with Code59.....

I need to do this exact same thing.... Jeff made me a chip for when my truck was stock internaly. It was VERY VERY close. I was VERY happy with it.. even though he wanted the truck to be there for tune.

I now have the delema that the engine is built and far past stock. Cam/porting/L35's 2.02/1.60's Combustion chambers with serious work. All this adds up to throwing the fuel curve off.
I've got Autoprom/tuner pro and need help. Anyone avalible this weekend to give me a hand? I'll make the drive... she's close enough for that. Still runs good just dips in AFR's and I don't have anything setup in my laptop since it crashed and the HD needed replaced.

Thanks and great reading here.. I hope to do the same.
~Scott
 

2kwik4u

Resident slow guy
Re: A weeks review on tuning in a new build with Code59.....

I had also intended to write a pseudo "review" of Code59 from an outsiders position, although I got a little carried away with the story above to really get that out there.

There are some VERY VERY helpfull tools that are included in that project.

Wideband integration (not talking closed loop yet). There have to be 10 different customizable options for which wideband you are using, and how it is logged through the PCM. Mikes truck started with a DIY kit, and moved to the NGK kit after some hiccups. It was a truly simple switch, and the chip is the reason it was simple. A few checkbox's and it was back to logging. No problemo.

Extended VE Table....I'm still not 100% sold on the need, however it is nice to have if you want to adjust fueling within a certain range under boost. The resolution is there, and is a nice option to have. In the chip above I'm using the extended boost multiplier table which is why the grapsh drop off at like 131kpa of so. I think having BOTH is a better idea than just one, and ultimately while I didn't need, nor really use it this time, I think someone will in the future.

The AutoTune Spreadsheet....This thing is the best tool I've seen for organizing data. It filters out when you are in AE, and DE which makes converting the info you get into good usable data a ton easier. From my understanding you don't want to alter the VE table when looking at data that has AE or DE (acceleration enrichment...Think accelerator pump on a carb.....DE is decel enleanment...a gas saving feature that pseudo works), as they are multipliers that will greatly effect your AFR. Without this tool I can guarantee it would've taken me 2-3 times as long to get this tune even close.

In addition to organizing the data, Autotune will give you a new VE table to input to your tune. Like I mentioned above this is not a 100% cure all, but will move you in the right direction. While the Autotune is VERY exact (as most computers are) the ECM is not real exact. The reason for that is that say you are at 1700 rpm, and 90kPa on the VE table. There is no 1700 RPM value so it interpolates between the 1600RPM, and the 2000RPM values, likewise there is no 90kPa value on the table, so it grabs 95kPA, and 101kPa and interpolates again. This interpolation IMO is the same reason that you need a smooth table. One value that is not "sane" in this instance will skew the other three, and give you an unexpected result. Autotune, being very exact in nature will change one value of those three, and while it moves it the right direction, it's certainly not optimal......With all that said, it's a hugely valueable tool, and I saw some appreciable gains using JUST the VE table that it spit out. It's a safe way for a newbie like myself to tune. I just got ancy, and ahead of myself, and made changes by hand instead of waiting on the trends I was seeing to catch up with an AutoTune.

Closed Loop Wideband.....I only implemented this ONCE during the whole session. My laptop battery died, and I was heading home from Jeffs (long 45 mile trip), and it was a bit rich. I figured I would throw it in closed loop to save some gas for the trip home. It worked and it didn't. At the time the VE table was still very much full of spikes, and my thinking is that as the intergrator was changing it was pulling fuel from some areas, and then came accross a lean section, and had to try to quickly move back the other way. So while the program was working as it should, with a spotty VE table, it produced less than desireable results. I feel if I was to re-implement it at this time, it would create better results.

NO closed throttle table......There is an option flag in the code59 that allows you to use one VE table for all throttle positions. This was handy, and seems to work well. I think the theory behind it is that most of the major standalone systems only use one VE table with good results, so why shouldn't the stock ECM. I saw no problems in this, unless you are able to lug the motor at 700-1100 RPM with very low MAP as well. This might possibly be an issue on a 5spd application, but for us, I don't think it's a problem.

Again I really need to give the guys that have been writing and developing the code59 stuff a huge kudos. In driving and using the truck for a week, nothing really goofy or odd happened, and it behaved as if it was a stock computer the best I could tell. This kind of innovation doesn't come around often, and when it's released I'll suggest everyone try it to see how they like it. If for nothing else but to get the AE, DE, and PE flags in the datastream, and the AutoTune spreadsheet to organize your data......Even more importantly....IT'S FREE!!!!!
 

myclone

Donating Member
Re: A weeks review on tuning in a new build with Code59.....

2kwik4u said:
Yes, that is exactly what was happening. When Jeff first setup the Code 59 chip.......

Understood :tup:



The first was that it was locking SUPER SUPER low....like 35mph or something like that. With the tune being off it was creating a helluva hard truck to drive around town. I simply raised it so that while cruising around it stays unlocked, and happy. With the larger cam (which I forgot to mention in the post above, and I'll fix) and the larger turbo there is little bottom end to the truck, and when it's lugging around at 1500rpm in a 45mph sone it wasn't happy. Once he gets the 80E, and new convertor in I'm sure this will change as well. I totally agree that once the final setup is installed we will probably drop that back to the 40-45mph range to keep Johnny Law away, as well as the droning from all the resonance of a semi-open exhaust.

With a less than optimum tune and a bigger cam I understand 100% why you want to delay lock up. Id hafta check but IIRC mine locks at ~22mph in 2nd with minimal TPS....dont laugh its helped me creep off from a light more than once with da man watching/listening. Ive got a stock cam so low end isnt too soggy so you may not be able or even want to lock up that low.

The second issue isn't so much the convertor, but the way the engine was staying cool. I think his thermostat is stuck open because on the highway in 20 degree ambient temps the coolant temp was dropping to the 120 range. This would drop below the minimum temp threshold for the convertor to lock, and producing more RPM at cruise than desired. Lowering this temp setting in the chip fixed that.

As youve prolly noticed a stuck open or missing T stat makes for horribly unstable coolant temps which makes tuning a bear. Its like chasing a moving target when trying to nail down timing/fuel at different TPS and the coolant multiplyer is changing and goofing you up. Getting a working T stat in there will prolly make things a noticable amount easier...especially in cold weather.

It seems that the majority of the guys in this area, are plagued with either no motivation, or tons of motivation, and not time/money to get it done, or a combination of both (perhaps this is everywhere I dunno).

Raises hand..... If I have the time I dont have any money but if I have a few bucks I dont have any time or Im completely out of motivation so I feel your pain. Mostly its money since every time you do anything with these trucks you have to spend money elsewhere to upgrade everything that supports the first mod. No need to explain it since you guys know where Im coming from...
 

2kwik4u

Resident slow guy
Re: A weeks review on tuning in a new build with Code59.....

So Mr. Hardman was unable to come down on Wednesday to pickup his truck, so I have it again until Sunday when he has planned again to come get it. Of course I'm having a good time tuning so I've got the laptop out again, and have been doing more tweaking.

I had an issue where if you "free revved" the truck it would sputter, and cough, and generally not like me. I got to looking and the VE table had some lower values in the area that the revs/map was heading when you stabbed teh gas in neutral. I only looked here after futzing with the AE tables for 10-15 minutes. After raising the table in the 100kpa, and 1200 RPM range (a range I've found I don't really touch whilst actually driving) it now revs with at least a litte authority.

I've also found that if you get carried away with hand smoothing, you can move backwards. I did this with the idle area. I was hand smoothing away, and thought that the area at the lowest map, and RPM corner should look nice like the rest of the graph....not so much. It likes being kinda flat in that area. If I made it sloped like the rest of that area of the graph, when the engine would "plunge" to that area while engaging, or disengaging the trans, it would die. I am supposing I'm dropping the VE on that slope past the actuall lower limit of what the motor needs, but I'm not sure. In the end, the flatter that area is the better it idles.

A thought or two on AFR while cruising. Lean is good and cheap, however I'm finding anything over about 15.5 or so is simply too lean to get decent performance from. If it loads the motor at all that 15.5 is barely enough to keep it going, and not buck/cough/hesitate while driving. I still have a few spots that are in the 16:1 or higher range, and the truck seems to stumble through that area. I'm also finding that while under boost it seems to be liking something in the 11.8-12.1 area. If it goes richer than that it feels a bit sluggish (perhaps more timing will help with this?), any leaner and I'm picking up some knock. I'm sure this has been covered many times, but I thought I'd share my experiences so far as well.

In other thougths, here is the newest graph. This is from the 18th generation of the bin file. I'm guessing by the time Mike gets ahold of the truck I'll have near 40 hours in the tune, and probably 20 different bins.

 

ashman

------
Re: A weeks review on tuning in a new build with Code59.....

2kwik4u said:
A thought or two on AFR while cruising. Lean is good and cheap, however I'm finding anything over about 15.5 or so is simply too lean to get decent performance from. If it loads the motor at all that 15.5 is barely enough to keep it going, and not buck/cough/hesitate while driving. I still have a few spots that are in the 16:1 or higher range, and the truck seems to stumble through that area.

very similiar to what i'm seeing only, my truck doesn't seem to have issues in the low 16 range but, as it approaches 17, it starts to hesitate.

man, wouldn't it be nice to have access to a variable load dyno.
 

2kwik4u

Resident slow guy
Re: A weeks review on tuning in a new build with Code59.....

ashman said:
very similiar to what i'm seeing only, my truck doesn't seem to have issues in the low 16 range but, as it approaches 17, it starts to hesitate.

man, wouldn't it be nice to have access to a variable load dyno.

Mike Hardman and I were talking about that on the phone the other day. A few hours on a nice eddy current dyno would do WONDERS for the tune. DIal it in exactly where it needs to be, and with the realtime software, and equipment it shouldn't take more than a few hours to hit 95% of the load ranges.
 
Top