how much timing are you guys running on pump 93??

ModularTurbo

New member
Like the title states....

how much timing are you guys running on pump 93?

Right now I am running 24 degrees @ 25psi with a pte 60mm turbo, vortec heads and a built bottom end. I am using an Accel DFI gen 7 too FYI.
 

BoostedSUV

Active member
Re: how much timing are you guys running on pump 93??

I you spraying methanol with that much timing/boost on pump? If not you're next post will about an engine rebuild.
 

Osmosis

New member
Re: how much timing are you guys running on pump 93??

18 total advance with 18psi boost with no alky

26deg total with 20 psi with alky

Stock turbo:(
 

ModularTurbo

New member
Re: how much timing are you guys running on pump 93??

I you spraying methanol with that much timing/boost on pump? If not you're next post will about an engine rebuild.

I know that it sounds like I am running alot of timing but really its not that much.

I have a stand alone EMS so my commanded timing is always going to be higher than the commanded timing of a stock ecu tune. There are ignition advance adder tables that you may or not be able to see in your tune. I promise that if you were to check the actual timing under full load that it would be higher than what you are commanding in your base ignition advance map.

Maybe someone smarter on the subject can chime in about that.
 

sytyguy

Moderated User
Re: how much timing are you guys running on pump 93??

We know all about the additional tables (F1, F3, F80, etc...) and final spark advance. Having said that, most guys run 18-20 deg timing on pump gas and 22-24 on race gas (or meth) with stock or L35 heads. Add 2-4 deg to all above with Vortecs.
 

RealFastV6

@jb_and_his_coffee
Re: how much timing are you guys running on pump 93??

You're out of your mind. 24 deg @ 25psi on 93 without Alky won't last. I don't care what ECU you have.

ETA: Maybe your crank angle reference is wrong.
 

Aeroking

e.i.
Re: how much timing are you guys running on pump 93??

24deg on 24psi with meth, using an aftermarket ECU
 

qbnkiller

Conflaguration Specialist
Re: how much timing are you guys running on pump 93??

Contrary to what people think, that amount of timing is not out of the question. As I have said time and again, do what the spark plug tells you.
 

dgoodhue

BuSTeD 4.3
Re: how much timing are you guys running on pump 93??

It may seem high but its not out the question. You ideally want to give the what it wants not what you think it wants. You never know about the tolerance of parts perhaps the advance on the ignition module has some tolerance or the balance or timing set could be off a 1-2 degrees. If your monitoring the tune with a scan tool and reading the plugs from time to time, your engine might be in the perfec sweet spot with your tune (timing).
 

warmpancakes

New member
Re: how much timing are you guys running on pump 93??

Contrary to what people think, that amount of timing is not out of the question. As I have said time and again, do what the spark plug tells you.


been waiting for you to pop in, so alex you didnt answer the question how much timing are YOU running, that cant be done
 

RealFastV6

@jb_and_his_coffee
Re: how much timing are you guys running on pump 93??

Right now I am running 24 degrees @ 25psi with a pte 60mm turbo, vortec heads and a built bottom end. I am using an Accel DFI gen 7 too FYI.

Has this monster been to the track or the dyno?
 

qbnkiller

Conflaguration Specialist
Re: how much timing are you guys running on pump 93??

been waiting for you to pop in, so alex you didnt answer the question how much timing are YOU running, that cant be done

if I posted what I run, buttholes would pucker to the point that people wouldn't shit right for weeks.

As I stated earlier, do what your engine tells you - not what teh interwebz says.
 

sytyguy

Moderated User
Re: how much timing are you guys running on pump 93??

The block is irrelevant* to how much boost you can run. The issue with the stock turbo is that once you get out of it's efficiency range, it starts to generate heat in an exponentially increasing fashion. The stock turbo usually begins to leave it's efficiency range around 18-19 psi. Beyond this point, you will still create more power by raising the boost level, but you will also be generating a great deal more heat. If you can combat this (with increased intercooler efficiency, methanol, etc...), you can benefit from the additional boost in a much greater way. It's when you don't combat this extra heat that problems arise (increased IATs lead to detonation leads to broken parts). Keeping the charge cool is priority one for forced induction vehicles....no matter what turbo or build you have.

So, what I'm saying is that, yes you can run 18, 20, 22, 24 psi with the stock turbo and stock block, but you need to keep the intake temps cool, run a higher quality fuel, and make sure you have monitoring capabilities.

* What I mean by that is that all the strong parts in the world won't survive a bad tune and detonation. Conversely, a stock bottom end can survive far more than it is rated for if given a proper tune and no detonation. Obviously, there is a power limit for certain components, but with all things ideal, the stock bottom end can survive much more than you think
 

Typhoon-Dennis

New member
What would you think is better: Front mounted Air to Air intercooler or the original System with another water-line location?
I will work with Datamaster and my aftermarket gauges.
A Meth-System would be nice for more cooling...maybe i can get a larger water cooler.
I friend from me works with an big fuel cooler and it works great.

I can get here 100 Octane fuel:)
 

sytyguy

Moderated User
Re: how much timing are you guys running on pump 93??

Depends on the application. If you want to always have cool temps and do a lot of "on-off throttle" driving (hot lapping at dragstrip, every single red light, road racing, etc...) then air-air will be a better choice. If you want to get your intake as cold as possible for one WOT blast (making a personal best pass at the dragstrip), the air-water is the better choice. It really depends on how you drive. Air-air can be used in place of air-water in every situation, but is limited in how cold it can go compared to air-water. Air-water can be shine in all the same situations as air-air, but it heat soaks and cannot provide continuously adequate cooling when not allowed to "rest" and recover.

Obviously, there are extreme air-water systems that can handle consistent abuse just fine, and with methanol injection, air-air can get temps as cold as air-water. But I was talking of average systems with no external help.
 

alwayscode390

pppssssshhhhhtttttttttttt
Re: how much timing are you guys running on pump 93??

Will meth injection on a stock air/water setup (with a johnson high flow pump) help to combat the heat soak? Will it get it as cool as an air/air setup with meth can? ---
 

sytyguy

Moderated User
Re: how much timing are you guys running on pump 93??

Will meth injection on a stock air/water setup (with a johnson high flow pump) help to combat the heat soak? Will it get it as cool as an air/air setup with meth can? ---
Methanol will help combat heat in all scenarios. Obviously, water injection is best for strictly heat removal, but methanol provides considerable heat removal while introducing an additional combustible fuel into the chamber. This is why methanol is usually the cooling agent of choice for those with undersized injectors, because of it's fuel "band-aiding" capabilities.

As for your actual question, it depends on the efficiency of the air-water setup. Hypothetical here, but lets say you have an A2A setup that's capable of keeping IATs at ambient + 10% (200 degF comp outlet temp resulting in 93% efficiency) and an A2W setup that can achieve IATs of ambient + 30% under (200 degF comp outlet temp resulting in 79% efficiency) at static cooling levels (road speed, no boost, just cruising). Now, let's say it's an 80 degree day, at 15 psi, resulting in 200 degF ....you'll have static temps of:

A2A - 88 degF
A2W - 104 degF

But that's not the real issue.....the problem is with heat retention and thermal transfer barriers.....and here's where the real downside to A2W systems show when used outside of ideal situations (ice assistance, rest time, etc...). A2W systems must enact 4 thermal transfers to expel intake charge heat to the atmosphere (where you ultimately want the heat released). Each of these transfers occurs through a barrier which provides resistance to the thermal transfer and, thus, reduce efficiency. A2A systems only have to enact 2 thermal transfers and this increases efficiency. The downside is that you can't (easily) introduce a supercooling principle to one of the barriers in an A2A system, whereas you can (easily) introduce it to the A2W system.

Now, back to our hypothetical.....let's say that the A2A has a minimum efficiency of ambient + 40% (73% efficiency....pretty much the industry average). That would mean that at full boost, no rest period, and significant time under boost, the IATs would be around 112 degF. However, the A2W cannot achieve this level of efficiency on it's own, and loses efficiency as heat is retained. So , while you can achieve 79% efficiency static, you could fall to 50% or 30% or even 10% as heat soak sets in and heat is continually introduced to the system. So, let's imagine you're on a back road doing a launch to 120 mph blast and you've allowed both systems to rest down to (near) ambient.....well your run might look like this (again, hypothetical here):

A2A
- 1 second: 90 degF
- 3 seconds: 95 degF
- 5 seconds: 100 degF
- 8 seconds: 105 degF
- 10 seconds: 110 degF
- 12 seconds: 110 degF
- 15 seconds: 110 degF

A2W
- 1 second: 90 degF
- 3 seconds: 90 degF
- 5 seconds: 95 degF
- 8 seconds: 105 degF
- 10 seconds: 115 degF
- 12 seconds: 125 degF
- 15 seconds: 140 degF

Now let's pretend you wait a minute and make the same run again. Here's what you might see:

A2A
- 1 second: 100 degF
- 3 seconds: 100 degF
- 5 seconds: 105 degF
- 8 seconds: 110 degF
- 10 seconds: 110 degF
- 12 seconds: 115 degF
- 15 seconds: 115 degF

A2W
- 1 second: 120 degF
- 3 seconds: 120 degF
- 5 seconds: 125 degF
- 8 seconds: 135 degF
- 10 seconds: 145 degF
- 12 seconds: 160 degF
- 15 seconds: 175 degF

So as you can see, for the first little while, the A2W actually retains a more stable temperature pattern, UNTIL heat soak begins to overwhelm the system and the lower heat exchanger cannot keep up with the demand of heat being introuduced. All of this is simply a byproduct of the type of system the A2W is and the thermal barriers present in this system. Sadly, the same component (water) that allows the A2W to be supercooled (iceing upper IC or using an ice chest) and retain that cooling for the needed period of time becomes the crux of the system when that cooling has given way to heat soak.

[Disclaimer: This is all out of my own head (efficiencies and thermal results) so ignore any inaccuracies or contrary results to what you have encountered.]
 
Last edited:
Top