Re: Can I use them like this if they fit ?
Re: Can I use them like this if they fit ?
I don't know of anything wrong with Koni....In fact, there is a normal set of Koni's on my truck right now. I will say that having to pull the shock and rotate to adjust is a real bugg'r on the fronts, since I had to wire them closed (pushed them closed and wired them with .030 MIG wire to keep them closed) in order to install them. Otherwise, they would just extend open and they weren't going in that way.
From your research, the pickings from Koni that will do the job are few. The 30 series does sound like it'll work, most of the others have issues (too much $$$, can't be inverted, too big, etc). Don't have any info on the 30 series. Guess I ought to look.
I spent a little time looking at AFCO's website. They have a bunch of offerings, but their website doesn't really give as much info as one would desire (can you mount them upside down?, are these streetable?, etc). They've got some pretty nice shocks on there though (not sure where I'd put the reservoir on those remote reservoir T2's, but since I don't have the $650 each, I'm ruling them out anyway).
QA1's website has some more info. There are a number of small body shocks, and most will say whether they can be run inverted or not, and a bunch of other info. Not real sure how streetable they are, however. But if they're fully rebuildable, and reasonably priced to start with, then maybe "freshening up" shocks every year or two would be acceptable for a daily driven truck.
I think one of the things that should be worked through is the required spring rate. 600 lbs looks like the limit for off-the-shelf 1 7/8" ID springs. So, if over 600lb rate is required to hold the nose up and give decent ride, I'd say that this is a no-go. I guess if necessary, one could have custom springs made (with higher rates or even variable rates) but that might get to be tricky and potentially expensive.
Another thing to consider is spring rate vs effective spring rate of the sway bar, and where to put the stiffness in the system. I don't know all that much about suspension design, but some of what I've seen is that on a higher performance car, you end up with stiffer springs and softer sway bars (most of the body roll is controlled with the spring, not the sway bar). But then you may end up with excessive ride harshness because of springs that are the appropriate stiffness for performance, but way to stiff to be compliant. Like I said, I don't know all that much about suspension design, but I know enough to be concerned about doing it right.
And my Edison quote was more in reference to the Koni's that took themselves out of contention. Too expensive, can't run upside down, too big.....This won't work, that won't work, that won't work either. Its easy to get down. But Edison had such a "out there" perspective, relative to the rest of the world. Wasn't really trying to imply anything about Koni, just that I expect we're going to consider a bunch of stuff, alot of it will be ruled out for one reason or another, and that we shouldn't get down just because we learned what won't work.
'JustDreamin'