It has a hack alarm, but there is not a remote start. The alarm circuit is also seperate and not connectedkentuc said:Remote starters should have a switch on the hood to prevent that from happening.{starting while your working under the hood]
will do Marty :lol: . Currently sourcing some new parts... everyone go to the FS section and buy my leftovers from the Ty so this GT can get a new motor :tup:Syborg Twin Turbo said:looks like a cool project keep me posted
Turboz said:The starting when connecting the battery is most likely a remote starter in te vehicle. The old starter would do that if the battery was disconected and reconected. Not saying that is it but worth a look.jay
jjorgensen52 said:will do Marty :lol: . Currently sourcing some new parts... everyone go to the FS section and buy my leftovers from the Ty so this GT can get a new motor :tup:
http://www.syty.net/forums/showthread.php?t=43562
jjorgensen52 said:Well, more work done tonight. Didn't finish welding as my MiG decided it wasn't going to lay a bead worth a darn.
mattw said:Looking good.. I'm betting the issue isn't the welder though.. ;-)
-Matt
Nope, especially when you're pushing the limits of your welder (I think i'm rated to 1/8" plate :lol: )Black Knight said:I've never MIG welded alum. Does it turn out as well as TIG welding it?
jjorgensen52 said:Alright, little bit of a status update on this truck.
I have now (as stated above) purchased a long block 4.3 marine motor for the truck. The build will be:
- Marine motor
- LS1 / eDist ignition setup
- All stock accesories (a/c included)
- Polished late model vortec manifold, modified to accept a CMPI style upper manifold, running late model central injector
- LT1 throttle body (probably a 52mm eventually, 48mm for now) on modded CMPI upper
- Gibson exhaust / high flow stainless cat and potentially edelbrock 1.5" headers
- T-5Z (world class) from an 88-92 F-body running an internal slave cylinder (2.95 1st and 0.63 5th)
With the T-5, I am using the f-body for the better gear ratios,stoughter internals, and the shifter location. It comes up within 1" of where the pivot of the stock shifter is. I'm going to be using a shift boot and knob from a C4 to replicate a stock appearing option. Hopefully this will all be together and running right around new years.
jjorgensen52 said:T-5Z (world class) from an 88-92 F-body running an internal slave cylinder (2.95 1st and 0.63 5th)
With the T-5, I am using the f-body for the better gear ratios,stoughter internals, and the shifter location. It comes up within 1" of where the pivot of the stock shifter is. I'm going to be using a shift boot and knob from a C4 to replicate a stock appearing option. Hopefully this will all be together and running right around new years.
Not yet. The bell housing from the f-bodies is offset .... the tranny is on a slight angle, which I do not think will work in this app anyway. I'm just going to pull one out of a early 90's S10 to use. I did want the shifter back though (the difference is just a shade under 8" according to Borg Warner's dimensions )SY2455 said:Which bellhousing are you using for the swap? I have a 1988 2.8 S-10 that the motor was bad in. So to keep the T-5 trans with a 4.3 engine, I found a 1990 T-5 trans and bellhousing from a GTA with 65,000 miles for a good price only to find that the F-body shifter is located 5" back from the stock T-5 location and the bellhousing is in the way of the exhaust on the driver side. I swap the gears out to fix the shifter location. Now I just need to take care of the bellhousing issue and clutch. Do you have the part numbers that you are using? TIA
SY2455 said:You have to be careful which bellhousing you get because most of the early S-10 had the Munice 5 speed with the 4.3 engine. If you can locate a 1987 to 1989 Astro or Safari van with a 4.3 that would be great because they used the T-5 trans. I still trying to locate one as well. If you find two let me know and I will do the same for you.
If you are using that F-body trans as is, you will find that the F-body bellhouse will work as is. Do to the fact the mount on the trans is machine at a angle to work with the F-body bellhousing. If you not sure what I am talking about look at the tailshaft housing when you have the trans mounting hole at the front parallel to the ground.
You may want to get a T-56 from a 1993 to 1997 F-body instead.